Many economists and historians have remarked that the past few years or so have felt like the ?Roaring ?20s? in the 20th century. The Roaring ?20s preceded the Great Depression, so we?re on track for that, probably this year under Donald Trump. I bring this up because Vogue?s April cover is with Gigi Hadid, and the theme of the editorial is ?the Roaring ?20s.? The aesthetic is lovely, but the message behind it is pretty? on the nose. Anyway, it?s been a minute since Gigi has done a major magazine interview, and she even talked about her boyfriend Bradley Cooper in this piece. They?ve been dating for about a year and a half. They?re both single parents, but obviously? there?s an age gap and experience-gap given the 20-year age difference. Gigi also talks about coparenting with her ex, Zayn Malik. Some highlights from Vogue:

Her early-model days were stressful: ?It got to a place where I would have three days off, and I would stay inside for three days. And that?s very intense. I felt like, even when I was just trying to put on something casual and go get coffee or go to the pharmacy, to get outside, someone had a comment: Why is she dressed like that? She looks like a slob. She looks overworked, whatever. I?ve been called every name in the book.?

Coparenting with Zayn: ?Zayn and I do our custody schedules months in advance,? Hadid says, planning everything around the weeks they have Khai. ?That doesn?t mean that it doesn?t change here and there, but we help each other out and have each other?s backs.? She and Malik have entered this new phase of their partnership with ?love, and a feeling of camaraderie,? she says, accepting?more or less?that their relationship will likely forever be under some kind of microscope. ?There is the hard part of the world knowing this much, and thinking they know everything. And at the end of the day, we?re not interested in giving everyone our whole story. What we are interested in is raising our daughter together, with so much respect for each other, and not just as co-?parents, but what we?ve been through together.?

On social media: ?I don?t think it would be fully genuine to post nothing of Khai but I also don?t want to put anything up that would take away from her privacy and her peace.? I ask her if she?s ever tempted to give up on social media entirely, but it is clearly not in her nature. ?I?ll go to Paris, and there?s people in front of shows that have been fans of mine for 10 years. And I love that. I love connecting with people.? I am grateful for social media, and the ways that it has connected me to the world. I wouldn?t have the same career without it?[but] My Instagram is like snail mail, if you follow me, you have to be patient, life has to load.? It?s different from how socials felt when I was younger. It doesn?t come as naturally to me as it did when Instagram started.?

On Bradley Cooper: ?Bradley has opened me up to going to the theater more, and that?s something that?s so nice to bring back into my life. You want to give yourself a normal experience of dating and even for my friends who aren?t public figures, that?s hard. Where do you go? And, what? You just start talking to people? And then there?s another added layer of privacy and security. You want to believe that people are going to have your back and not call TMZ or go on Deuxmoi or whatever, but you just don?t know.?

She?s keeping her relationship to herself: Whatever strange dance dating as a supermodel might require, she describes her relationship now as ?very romantic and happy,? though there are parts of it she wants to keep to herself, not because there is anything especially secretive about it, but because ?it?s just not part of our relationship to share for whatever reason.? She?s aware that people?those unnamed ?sources? upon which an entire ecosystem of clickbait headlines rests?will provide information ?that?s kind of right and kind of wrong,? she says. But ?you just have to let it go; you can?t always correct everything.?

She probably wouldn?t have dated Bradley if she met him when she was younger: ?I think just getting to the point where knowing what you want and deserve in a relationship is essential and then to find someone that is in a place in their life where they know what they want and deserve?and you both do work separately to come together and be the best partner that you can be. I just feel really lucky. Yeah, lucky?s the word. I respect him so much as a creative and I feel that he gives so much to me: encouragement and, just, belief. For those people you admire to encourage you, it can create so much belief in yourself. Like, what?s the worst thing if I auditioned for this? You jump and take the leap.?

[From Vogue]

This sort of made me a convert on B-Coop and Gigi. I?ve always side-eyed their relationship and wondered if it was all some PR conspiracy, a convenient showmance. But hearing Gigi describe it? I get it. He likes that she?s much younger and she absorbs what he teaches her, and she likes being with someone older, more mature, someone who isn?t playing a lot of games with her. At least I hope that?s how it is. As for Zayn? I think their relationship was always pretty toxic, but I guess they?re making the best out of it and both trying to be good parents to Khai.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Vogue (@voguemagazine)

Cover & IG courtesy of Vogue.

Here are some photos of King Charles last week, visiting the HMS Prince of Wales. The Royal Navy is preparing for a ?major global deployment to the Indo-Pacific this spring.? Charles made a point of wearing his Canadian military honours with his uniform. Canadians noticed that and they were reportedly pleased that Charles made the choice to subtly show his alliance to Canada. He is, after all, king of Canada too. This too is all part of Charles?s delicate diplomatic dance with Britain?s North American allies. Just as Donald Trump was calling for America to ?annex? Canada, Charles sent Trump a hand-written letter, inviting Trump to come to the UK for a de facto second state visit. That invitation was received by Trump one day before Trump and JD Vance went apesh-t on President Zelenskyy in the Oval Office, childishly berating the Ukrainian president. All of which to say, there are now widespread calls for Charles to rescind the invitation and publicly distance himself from all things Trump. An excerpt from Simon Heffer?s latest piece in the Telegraph:

The day after Donald Trump and JD Vance ambushed Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office, an American friend (who is no fan of the US president) railed at me by text message about what she considered the King?s poor judgment in asking Trump to pay a state visit ? and an unprecedented second one at that. Why was His Majesty bestowing this honour on a head of state who had publicly humiliated a supposed ally in this way?

I explained that the King acts in all political matters (which include the diplomatic decision about a state visit), only on the advice of his ministers. This convention exists to keep the Crown above politics. That the King had written to President Trump ? a letter the president joyfully flaunted during his meeting last week with Sir Keir Starmer ? inviting him to Britain was, I told her, not because His Majesty wanted it, but because his Prime Minister thought an invitation was in the national interest.

Once Starmer had told the King his ministers? wishes, His Majesty had to comply. ?The King will not be dragged into politics. He will follow the advice of his Prime Minister. State visits are a vital part of soft power. And soft power is all we have left,? says one senior politician.

It might, of course, be the case that the King accepted the pragmatic argument for a state visit, which will doubtless help Starmer?s efforts to court Trump as America?s relationship with the rest of the world becomes increasingly uncertain. If the King did object, however, refusing would have precipitated a constitutional crisis ? the resignation of the Prime Minister and the Government, and a general election on the issue. If, after such an election, Starmer remained in office and the King still refused, it could force an abdication.

After the Zelensky incident, politicians from various parties said the invitation should be rescinded. The Scottish National Party leader, John Swinney, said it was ?hard to believe? it could stand; Alicia Kearns, a Tory MP, wanted it cancelled. There are rumours of disquiet in Labour?s ranks, whose considerable cohort of Trump-haters have so far kept quiet. Calls to reconsider the invitation also came from Canada, which Trump believes should become America?s 51st state. ?I don?t think Trump realises the King is Canada?s Head of State too,? says a former minister. ?If he persists in trying to annex Canada, that would change everything.? In an interview with The Telegraph this week, Danielle Smith, the premier of Alberta, Canada?s wealthiest province, publicly urged the King to stand up to Trump over his threat to annexe the Commonwealth nation.

Starmer refuses to withdraw the invitation. An unpleasant tone emerged from Washington, with hints of consequences for the UK/US relationship if the visit were stopped. Public feeling appears strong against the visit. A poll published five days after the Zelensky ambush showed 42 per cent of Britons opposed to it, and 51 per cent saying Trump should never have been asked in the first place. Two petitions demanding the visit be cancelled quickly attracted 280,000 signatures. A petition against his 2019 state visit garnered 1.8 million signatures, when the provocation was less.

The poll was conducted before the president?s decision to ?pause? military aid to Ukraine. As it becomes clear that the Trump administration no longer shares the same stance on Ukraine and Nato as Britain or much of Europe, opposition to a visit meant to reinforce a shared commitment could increase. This shift could have significant constitutional implications, which the Prime Minister will need to address, with the King remaining vigilant.

Serious public disquiet, or even civil disobedience, arising from the visit or even just from its imminence, could well drag the King into politics ? the very thing the constitutional monarchy was designed to avoid. In 2019 a demonstration of an estimated 75,000 people filled central London for Trump?s first visit; the public perception that Trump had bullied and abandoned Ukraine could provoke a far larger one. His Majesty, however unfairly, might be identified with the presence and the actions of the unpopular president. That might not merely damage the King?s reputation; it could damage the institution of monarchy, something the constitution has evolved to avoid. These are delicate issues, as they always are when trying to renew relations with a head of state whose behaviour leaves much to be desired. The Government will have to decide whether more damage might be done by Trump?s coming, or by his not coming. It could be one of the most important decisions Starmer ever has to make.

[From The Telegraph]

Yeah, it?s as I?ve said all along ? it?s not Charles?s call to send OR rescind the invitation to Trump. He?s doing what Keir Starmer wants, and Starmer is trying to maintain the European alliances along with the American alliance. Can I just say? All of this hand-wringing over dinner invitations a year in advance is SO British. It?s actually what British commentators do with everything involving the monarchy and the Windsors, and it?s wild to see this kind of thing extend to the world of politics. There was no timeline offered in Charles?s invitation to Trump, not even a general ?let?s see if we can make this happen next year.? By all accounts, it would take a year or longer for Buckingham Palace to even plan a state visit like this. Do British people know how much can change in a year?

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

Embed from Getty Images
Two years ago, Vanna White made headlines when she hired a lawyer to help her negotiate a new Wheel of Fortune contract. People were shocked to learn that Vanna hadn?t gotten a pay raise in 18 years and had been making considerably less money than former host Pat Sajak did. Vanna was a class act throughout it, though, and held out for months until she finally got a new contract with a hefty raise. Reportedly, that contract is good through 2026. During an appearance on IHeartRadio?s Elvis Duran and the Morning Show, Vanna shared something else about her WOF contract: she only works 34 days a year.

The lucky winner is ? Vanna White.

The co-host of ?Wheel of Fortune? revealed the surprisingly low number of days she films the hit game show each year during a recent radio interview with ?Elvis Duran and the Morning Show.?

?We film about 34 days a year,? White shared. ?That?s it.?

The 68-year-old model spilled the truth about the short production schedule on Wednesday, after radio co-host Nate Marino mentioned that he only recently learned that the show didn?t air live every night.

However, White?s schedule requires her to film ?six shows a day.?

The cultural icon, who has co-hosted the show for 42 years, still has to change outfits and shoes multiple times daily between tapings.

?Come on. You could feel bad for me,? she quipped.

?I do not feel sorry for you one bit,? Duran joked. ?That sounds like a great job.?

The radio personalities were seemingly stunned that White spends most of her time away from the set, which is based at Sony Pictures Studios in Culver City, Calif.

?So weird. You have 331 days off a year?? Marino asked.

?Yes, I guess so,? White said.

?And no one deserves it more than you,? Duran said. ?You?re just the best.?

[From Yahoo Entertainment]

I don?t know why I was so surprised to hear about their filming schedule. I have a friend who worked on Steve Harvey?s court show and he said they film multiple episodes a day over a short period of time. I looked it up and Jeopardy has a similar filming schedule, only they shoot about six eps per day for 46 days. It makes sense that WOF does this too, but it?s still rocking my world a little bit! I guess that?s the beauty of a game show with little to no continuity. That is a sweet gig right there. No wonder Vanna has lasted so long and why Seacrest wanted it so badly. Oooh, this means that she got to wear six different gorgeous dresses every day.

When I saw those headlines about Vanna?s salary negotiations, I read that she was in her mid-60s at the time and wondered why she didn?t want to retire when Sajak did and let a new guard take the reins. Hearing that she gets 331 days a year off?it makes perfect sense. Vanna is 68 now, but if she wants to renegotiate and stay at WOF, then I hope she uses that same lawyer and gets another pay bump.

Embed from Getty Images

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Wheel of Fortune (@wheeloffortune)

Photos credit: Backgrid, Roger Wong/INSTARimages, Getty and via Instagram

Last year and in January of this year, we were told repeatedly that the Princess of Wales would simply not be ?back to work as usual? for a long time, perhaps forever. Sources repeatedly described Kate?s new post-cancer philosophy as what amounted to ?I do what I want,? meaning, she?ll show up a few times here and there, but otherwise, she?s just never going to be back to work in any meaningful way. What?s weird about all of that is? Kate has been seen a normal amount (for her) this year. She?s made some appearances on behalf of charities and patronages, she went to Wales with William, she visited the hospital where she was ?treated for cancer,? she went to the Commonwealth Day service. If not for the lectures from palace courtiers about Kate?s work schedule, this has all resembled Kate?s previous first-quarter schedules (pre-2024). In any case, the narrative is already being reinforced: we should be happy with the crumbs of public appearances, safe in the knowledge that Kate ?has got her mojo back.?

As the Princess of Wales announced earlier this year she is in remission, ?It certainly seems to me that she has got her mojo back,? former BBC royal correspondent Jennie Bond told OK. ?Catherine is looking fantastic and looks as if she is enjoying every engagement.?

After being out of public duty so much last year, ?we are seeing more of her than many of us expected so early in the year,? Bond added, making note that ?the welcome she?s getting wherever she goes must make her realize that she is the star of the royal family.?

Last year saw not only Kate?s cancer diagnosis but also King Charles?; while Kate?s cancer treatment has concluded, his continues. While William and Kate are still the Prince and Princess of Wales?and not on the throne, as they will eventually be?the couple are taking every chance they can get to be with kids Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis, including skipping the BAFTAs last month in favor of a family vacation in the Caribbean.

?She knows perfectly well that many parents don?t have the luxury of choosing to be with their young children all the time,? Bond recently told The Mirror. ?And she, too, is returning to her royal role?but she is lucky enough to be able to do it on her own terms, and she is sticking to that.?

Last year?s health battle realigned Kate?s priorities, as well as those of her husband, Bond said. ?I don?t think anyone is ever the same after an experience with cancer,? she said. ?William and Catherine must now cherish even more every single day that they spend together and with their children.?

[From InStyle]

?She knows perfectly well that many parents don?t have the luxury of choosing to be with their young children all the time? ? no one has said that it?s all or nothing for William and Kate, that?s just the approach they?ve always taken to their kids? schedules. As in, they get vacations from work every time their kids are off from school, and their kids have a lot of school breaks. As in, Will and Kate can?t work because of the school run, because they prioritize their family, etc. There are plenty of parents who work part-time or full-time and still have lots of time with their kids. Anyway, I don?t think Kate has her mojo back because that implies she had mojo at some point. These Commonwealth Day photos do not scream ?mojo? to me.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Avalon Red.

Jennifer Garner has been quietly dating John Miller since 2018. They?re seen out together somewhat regularly, but he?s never walked a red carpet with her and, obviously, they?ve spent years never putting their relationship on display. I?ve never really paid much attention to him, and as I was looking through photos of him, he definitely reminded me of Michael Vartan (who J-Garner dated many lifetimes ago). By all accounts, Miller is a solid, low-drama guy who respects that his partner successfully co-parents with her ex-husband. Unfortunately, Garner?s ex-husband is a giant drama queen who uses Garner to get back at his other ex-wife. Ben Affleck made a big show of affection with Garner at their son Samuel?s birthday party, then Ben wouldn?t shut up about how he wants another shot with Garner. Garner made it clear that she?s not interested, then sources close to Ben ranted about how he wants nothing to do with Jennifer Lopez. A lot has happened in the past few weeks, and all of it has been very stupid. So how does John Miller feel about it?

Jennifer Garner?s boyfriend, John Miller, issued an ultimatum after Ben Affleck was spotted getting cozy with his ex-wife, a source exclusively tells Page Six. The CaliBurger CEO ?has always been supportive of Ben and Jen?s co-parenting relationship but feels Ben crossed the line,? the insider says.

?John knows there?s nothing going on between Jen and Ben, but he doesn?t think those photos are a good look and feels it?s disrespectful to their relationship.?

According to the source, Miller, 47, ?gave Jen an ultimatum? ? ?he doesn?t want to see anything like that again or he has no choice but to walk away.?

The ?Gone Girl? star, 52, was seen affectionately grabbing the ?13 Going on 30? actress, also 52, as the couple celebrated their son Samuel?s 13th birthday on March 2. The Oscar winner grabbed the Emmy nominee around the waist as she focused her paintball gun on a target at the Combat Paintball Park in Castaic, Calif. Affleck pulled Garner in toward him, and she appeared to welcome the embrace. The ?Daredevil? co-stars ? who also share Violet, 19, and Seraphina, 16 ? looked cozy as they laughed and closely chatted while participating in the festivities.

Reps for Miller, Garner and Affleck did not immediately respond to Page Six?s requests for comment.

As Page Six previously reported, Miller hasn?t been ?thrilled? about the exes ? who were married from 2005 to 2018 ? spending more time together. Miller ?knows Ben and Jen have been leaning on each other more than ever lately and have a really close relationship.?

?Their growing bond is getting to be a bit much when Ben spends all the holidays with them like Christmas and Thanksgiving,? the insider said. ?John feels like a third wheel.?

[From Page Six]

Here?s the thing? while this is Page Six and should be treated with suspicion, I actually think Ben?s behavior has been inappropriate and disrespectful, and I could totally see how Garner?s partner would feel the same. Now, is Miller issuing ultimatums or whatever? I have no idea, but I can?t imagine that Miller is pleased with Ben?s antics these days. That being said, Garner has made it perfectly clear that she has no interest in Ben?s attempt at reconciliation, or whatever this was. I think Ben is trying to cause problems for BOTH Jennifers ? and I hope both Jennifers ignore him.

Photos courtesy of YouTube screenshots and Backgrid.

I cannot get over how many people are completely falling out over a Black woman with a cooking and entertaining show. With Love, Meghan is literally on a streamer ? you have to go out of your way to locate it on Netflix, you have to choose to watch it! People are acting like WLM is being shoved down their throats, or that they?re being forced to watch it and forced to judge and mock the Duchess of Sussex. Throughout all of the ridiculous ?controversies? around WLM in the past week, I keep thinking? have none of these people ever watched a cooking show before? None of them have watched Nigella Lawson or Ina Garten or Martha Stewart or any of the other cooks and chefs in this space? Meghan isn?t reinventing the wheel ? these shows are always based on vibes, and millions of people like Meghan?s vibe. But that hasn?t stopped an army of haters from screaming, crying and throwing up. Speaking of, yet another British-based chef has stepped up to disparage and denigrate Meghan.

Celebrated chef Richard Corrigan has prepared food for the Royal Family, but he finds the Duchess of Sussex?s new Netflix cookery and lifestyle show unpalatable.

?I admit I watched With Love, Meghan ? it?s a bit pretentious,? the Irishman tells me. ?I don?t like the pretence. California is all very Hollywood, it?s all very samey ? Britain is not like that.?

Corrigan, 61, who runs Mayfair restaurants Bentley?s and Corrigan?s, says Prince Harry and Meghan have become a strain on King Charles, who is still being treated for cancer. The chef compares them to Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson, another American divorcee. Edward abdicated in 1936 so he and Mrs Simpson could be married.

?I don?t think anyone likes people doing cheap TV. If you?re gonna leave [royal life], buy yourself a nice pad and entertain and enjoy yourself, but don?t become a burden,? Corrigan says at the Murphia List 2025 at Number Six in Marylebone, celebrating Irish-born hospitality leaders ahead of St Patrick?s Day.

He sympathises with the King?s position. ?You can never be responsible for who your children marry, and you shouldn?t be ? they have to make their way in the world.? He adds: ?The royals are a nice bunch ? we all have odd ones in the family.?

This is not the first time that Corrigan has expressed his disappointment with the former actress?s behaviour.

?I cooked for the Queen free of charge, of course,? he said. ?And I?ll cook for anyone, but let me just say, some people will have to pay. I?d let [Meghan] in the restaurant, for sure, but the Queen had the red carpet rolled out. Would Meghan? I don?t think so.?

[From The Daily Mail]

Do these people ever have a moment of self-reflection and think ?should I really say this? Do I sound like a huge racist?? Oh, how gracious, he?d let Meghan into his restaurant, but he wouldn?t roll out a red carpet, how telling! I don?t understand any part of this statement: ?I don?t think anyone likes people doing cheap TV. If you?re gonna leave [royal life], buy yourself a nice pad and entertain and enjoy yourself, but don?t become a burden.? How are Harry and Meghan a burden on the Windsors again? Because they support themselves and thrive far away from these ghastly people? And ?cheap TV???? The comparison to Wallis Simpson? these people are all f?king nutcases.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images, Netflix.

Prince William is not a tactile, handsy person. He rarely touches his wife when they?re in public, and if he does try to put a hand on her, she usually tries to move away. It?s crazy that the British press employs ?body language experts? and none of them ever remark on William?s closed-off stance, usually with two fists balled up in front of his crotch, like he?s constantly afraid that he?s going to get punched there. His posture is usually hunched over, and he and Kate share that weird freeze-gawping pose for their photo-ops. I guess my point is that William?s event on Tuesday was different ? he was suddenly hugging children and giving high-fives and low-fives to children. Hilariously, the Mail claims that William learned how to be affectionate with children from? his wife?? Sure, he?s definitely not copykeening the warm, sunny, rizz-factory couple in California.

Prince William showcased his caring side on Tuesday afternoon as he shared cuddles and high-fives with adorable schoolchildren waiting to welcome him to the West Midlands. The beaming Prince of Wales, 42, proved he can be just as warm-hearted as his wife, Kate, while sharing sweet moments with the little fans from Fibbersley Park Primary Academy in Willenhall.

Thanks to her natural warmth and ability to connect with families, Kate is often referred to as the ?Children?s Princess? by royal enthusiasts ? but her husband appeared to be just as capable of delighting the younger generations. From inspiring laughter and cheer to sharing hugs and high-fives, the father-of-three seemed in his element as he greeted the young crowd at the Sporting Khalsa FC.

William, in his role as patron of the Football Association, visited a referee training course at the club as part of the FA?s Reflective and Representative campaign which aims to recruit 1,000 people from Black, Asian and Mixed Heritage backgrounds into refereeing roles. The course started in July 2023 and combines theory and practical training to support those who are taking their first steps into officiating. Participants on the course will be equipped with the key skills and knowledge needed to referee grassroots football matches safely and effectively and is aimed at people aged 14 and over who wish to referee mini football, 9 v 9 and 11 v 11 games.

William greeted children from Fibbersley Park Primary Academy who were waving home-made flags and signs. He shook hands and gave high fives, saying: ?Are you missing your lessons right now? Your hands are cold.?

Spotting a child waving a sign that read ?Aston Villa are the best? he stopped to talk and said: ?They?re playing tomorrow.?

When William, 42, finally made it onto the pitch near Wolverhampton, he told the club?s directors Manjit Gill and Inder Grewal: ?Sorry to keep you guys waiting. I just broke the record for the number of high fives in ten minutes.?

[From The Daily Mail]

Whenever William is quoted in the British press, I?m genuinely like? is something wrong with him? I know, it?s just patter, it?s just small talk with children, but they make him sound so cold and robotic. Still, he?s the ?people?s prince? now. He hugged a child. He sat at a table with bored youths! He gave high-fives. He played with flags. He blew a whistle. Another successful day at the Keen Factory, another excellent field trip for this overgrown toddler. (And yes, the youths were very bored.)

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

Imagine you?re an actress who?s nominated and heavily favored to win at a well-known and highly photographed awards show. What?s the worst that can happen? You lose? The blogs put you on all of the Worst Dressed lists? The back of your dress rips when you win Best Actress? Well, Amanda Seyfried can tell you a good embarrassing award show story. Poor Amanda had an unfortunate wardrobe mishap at the 2023 Critics Choice Awards. While talking and joking around with Glen Powell, Amanda?s gorgeous vintage Dior dress, which had been ?falling apart? all night, fell apart for good. And it wasn?t a minor issue, either. Amanda?s breasts fell right out of that dress, right in front of Glen. Thankfully, Glen proved that chivalry isn?t dead by averting his eyes and quickly helping cover her up.

?My boobs fell out of my dress at the 2023 Critics Choice Awards,? 39-year-old actress [Amanda Seyfried] shares with PEOPLE in this week?s issue while discussing her lead role as Mickey in the new Peacock crime series Long Bright River.

Seyfried took home an award that year for her performance in The Dropout, but along with the trophy came an unexpected wardrobe mishap. ?I was wearing this amazing vintage dress. I made my stylist dress up in it before I went just for fun,? she recalls of the Dior Haute Couture gown.

She adds, ?It was kind of sewn together and it started truly falling apart, literally falling off of me on the red carpet, and I think there were even interviews where I?m saying it?s breaking off.?

It was when she was having a one-on-one conversation with Powell, 36, though, that things took a turn. ?I was talking to Glen Powell in the corner near my table, and we were joking around about something and I lifted my arms up, and my boobs were just out. My dress fell apart,? she shares.

Thankfully, Seyfried was in the company of a true gentleman. ?We both screamed, and like the gentleman he is, he covered me. He didn?t look? I think. None of us were expecting that, but that dress had truly just given up.?

When Seyfried went on stage to accept her award, she had to improvise. ?I ended up wearing someone else?s jacket on stage,? she explains. ?Because, well, it would?ve just been my boobs.?

[From People]

Oh man, that?s so embarrassing and also pretty funny. Thank goodness Glen was so quick-thinking and understanding about it. It?s also cool that he never turned it into one of his go-to interview stories, but has respectfully kept it on the down low. That said, now that Amanda?s spoken about it publicly, I?m so curious to know how Glen will answer when he inevitably gets asked to talk about the incident from his, umm, point of view.

Amanda is right that there is a video of her on the red carpet talking about how the dress kept falling down. She even frustratingly joked that she was going to take it off. It?s too bad, because I liked the dress! I actually remember Amanda appearing on stage with that black jacket. At the time, I figured that she was just cold! While having your dress break and boobs pop right out in front of a coworker is certainly embarrassing, it could have been so much worse. Her dress could have freed the girls while onstage accepting her award. That certainly would have made for a memorable night for everyone.

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

Photos credit: JPI Studios/Avalon, Getty, BlayzenPhotos/Backgrid

I remember being so disappointed when I first heard Brett Goldstein speak in his normal voice. He did something to his natural speaking voice on Ted Lasso ? he managed to consistently make his voice deeper and gruffer as he played Roy Kent, a character for which Goldstein won two Emmys. The real Brett Goldstein is more of an artsy writer/actor/comedian, and he actually comes across as very sweet and unassuming. Well, Goldstein will soon work with Jennifer Lopez on Office Romance, and people are trying to make ?J.Lo + Brett? into a thing. They were also recently spotted at a play!

Jennifer Lopez and Brett Goldstein are spending some quality time together. The pair was spotted at Oh, Mary! to support Betty Gilpin, who stars in the upcoming Office Romance with them.

J.Lo and Brett took a photo with the cast alongside Meryl Streep and Martin Short, as one does, but before you read into things, they were standing on opposite sides of the group.

That said, a source just told the Daily Mail, ?After a very tough start to 2025, Jennifer can?t wait to start a new project and it certainly helps that she will be working with a very handsome and smart star like Brett. He is one hot ticket and a real class act with talent to back it up?he not only acts but he writes amazing scripts. He is like the younger, better, British version of Ben. She thinks he is very cute.?

The source also somewhat hilariously claimed that ?Ben knows who Brett is, he is plenty aware. Brett is younger and smarter than Ben. It will irk him for sure.?

[From Yahoo]

While Goldstein isn?t married, he has been with Beth Rylance for years and I?m pretty sure they?re still together, although they keep it pretty quiet. Just FYI ? I?m sure J.Lo loves flirting with a handsome British man, but I think this will just be a friendship and working relationship for them. I also hope that J.Lo isn?t constantly thinking about ?so-and-so is like Ben/Ben will be so jealous!? Enough!!

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by OH, MARY! (@ohmaryplay)

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

This Wendy Williams situation is still so sad. [Socialite Life]
Anna Kendrick wants no part of Blake Lively?s mess. [LaineyGossip]
Recap & discussion of this week?s episode of The White Lotus. [Jezebel]
Jason Isaacs revealed ALL on The White Lotus. [Pajiba]
Brenda Song on when she knew Macaulay Culkin was the one. [Buzzfeed]
Who is Lily James dating now? [JustJared]
Why did Justin Trudeau resign? [Hollywood Life]
Jeopardy had a celebrity-feud category. [Seriously OMG]
What was your favorite Timothee Chalamet awards-season look? [RCFA]
Vintage photos of gay men in the 20th century ? so many mustaches. [OMG Blog]