It’s been a while since we’ve gotten an update on Brad Pitt’s completely real and not transactional in any way relationship with Ines de Ramon. We first heard about Pitt and Ines last fall, when someone’s crisis manager blanketed the gossip media with updates about how friends introduced them, and how things were heating up between them, how they spent Pitt’s 59th birthday together, how they’re “close to being officially exclusive.” Ines and Brad spent New Year’s together in Cabo in one of the most awkward paparazzi set-ups I’ve ever seen. Pitt also tried to pretend that his 29/30-year-old girlfriend is keeping him young and vital. Instead, he looks like a desperate loser who exclusively fake-dates married women. Ines’s husband just filed for divorce last week.

Paul Wesley is moving forward with his divorce from ex Ines de Ramon. About five months after the Vampire Diaries actor and jewelry designer announced their breakup, Paul filed divorce papers with the Los Angeles Superior Court to end their four-year marriage. According to the court document obtained by E! News Feb. 17, Paul—who didn’t fill out a request for spousal support—cited irreconcilable differences as the reason for split.

The 40-year-old listed their date of separation as “TBD,” though a rep for the couple told E! News in September that they had broken up in the spring of 2022.

“The decision to separate is mutual,” the rep said. “They request privacy at this time.”

Paul and Ines tied the knot in August 2018, per the filing, but didn’t make their red carpet debut until a year later at the Mercy For Animals 20th Anniversary Gala in Los Angeles.

[From E! News]

I know why he won’t, but if I was in Paul Wesley’s shoes, I would make a big, nasty fuss. I would give interviews and talk about the real timeline of their split and theorize about what Ines is getting out of this mess with Pitt. Speaking of, Pitt has been in New York for weeks now, filming Wolves with George Clooney. He didn’t invite Ines to join him, but he did send her flowers and bread on Valentine’s Day:

Despite being on opposite sides of the country, Brad Pitt made sure that Ines de Ramon’s Valentine’s Day was a special one. The “Bullet Train” actor, 59, reportedly sent a bouquet of pink peonies and a baguette to the jewelry company executive at her office in Los Angeles, according to the Daily Mail.

De Ramon was later seen flashing a smile as she carried her gifts out of the office and into her car.

A source confirmed to People that Pitt — who is in New York City filming “Wolves” — was indeed the one who sent the flowers and French bread to Ramon.

[From Page Six]

So authentic, it takes my breath away! I’m absolutely positive that Ines and Pitt’s publicist did NOT organize the peonies photoshoot with a friendly paparazzo, of course not!! HOW DARE YOU. I wonder if she got a bonus for ensuring that the baguette made it into the same frame too. Lord.

Meanwhile, the Daily Mail had an exclusive wherein “sources” revealed that Brad has introduced “most” of his children to Ines. I suspect we’re supposed to believe that Maddox and Pax don’t count, because those two hate his guts. A source claims that Brad and Ines are “bonding” over their respective divorces even though “Brad’s relationship with Angie was such a high-profile disaster and it is quite the opposite with Ines. She is zero drama and very lowkey.” The source also “insists” that Pitt “doesn’t give a damn” what Angelina thinks about Ines, “In fact he wants her to know that he is happy with someone else.” just FYI, Brad is the one suing Angelina over her efforts to disentangle herself from his toxic abuse.

Brad Pitt reportedly sent Valentine’s Day flowers to Ines de Ramon https://t.co/JeTleuljK2 pic.twitter.com/WPqEUFmlFm

— Page Six (@PageSix) February 18, 2023

Embed from Getty Images

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Getty.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Guy Fieri (@guyfieri)

Guy Fieri and his wife Lori are raising three boys: sons Hunter and Ryder and nephew Jules. Jules’ mother was Guy’s sister who passed away in 2011. The last time I wrote about Guy, I talked about his kids in that article but I didn’t cover much of that because there was so much else to talk about. There was a cute part about when they got their licenses, they were given the family minivan to drive for a year. It’s an old Chrysler with over 250K miles on it that once belonged to Guy’s parents. The conditions were, if the kid went a year without any tickets or accidents, they would get a new car. Cut to last New Year’s Eve, which is also son Ryder’s birthday. After a year of no tom-foolery in grandma’s minivan, Ryder was gifted a ‘new’ truck, which meant his brother’s truck after being overhauled. And Ryder had to pay half.

Guy Fieri’s son Ryder had a milestone birthday — and not just because he turned 17.

The Food Network superstar’s youngest son celebrated his birthday on New Year’s Eve and the big day came with a gift he’s been earning for a full year. In PEOPLE’s September cover story, Guy, 55, who also has a son Hunter, 26, revealed that he has a rule when it comes to the boys’ first vehicle.

“You know what Ryder drove to school [when] he got his license? He got my parents’ old, used 259,000-mile Chrysler minivan. I’m not buying Ryder a car, and I refuse to let him buy a car until he spends one year with no tickets, no accidents, driving the minivan,” he said at the time.

Well, one year has passed and Ryder has since graduated out of the minivan. Guy — who is hosting “Diners, Drive-Ins and Dives Live” at Food Network’s South Beach Wine and Food Festival on Feb. 24 — tells PEOPLE that to reveal the big gift, he set up a scavenger hunt for Ryder and his friends at his ranch in Northern California.

More specifically, it was for his brother’s crew cab pick-up truck: “Hunter wanted my truck, so Hunter bought my truck and we made Ryder buy Hunter’s truck.”

Guy and his wife, Lori, pitched in half the cost, and Ryder used the money he’s earned working on his dad’s shows to pay for the rest.

“We had taken the truck from Hunter, taken it to the detail shop, had it all gone through and made it Ryder’s truck and a couple of my buddies come driving up the driveway and honked the horn. He lost it. I’ve never seen him happier about a gift he was getting,” says the chef.

“I mean, what is the gift? The gift is, ‘Hey, you have to pay half the money we’ll pay the other half.’ But he was really excited,” he adds.

A few months later, the excitement still hasn’t worn off. Guy says Ryder takes the time to back the truck into their driveway every night.

“I saw him the other night. I was getting home about the same time he was. I say, ‘You back in?’ He goes, ‘Oh, yeah. Truck looks way cooler when you look at it from the front,’” recalls Guy.

[From People]

Many people buy their kids cars. It’s an incredible privilege, of course, but it’s not an uncommon practice for those who can swing it. And lord knows Guy loves his cars. I think making a teenager earn their share of a car is healthy. They’ll likely value the car as a result. Parents come up with different deals, like they buy the car and the kids pay for gas and maintenance. Or the kid can only use the car if they maintain certain grades. The terms are family specific, like Guy’s boys having to be ticket and accident free for a year to get a nicer car. Guy’s making a joke of making Ryder pay half the price of the truck not being so much of a gift but again, he’ll be invested in it. Plus, Ryder works for Guy’s lucrative shows, so the job is also a gift.

The part I most relate to is Ryder wanting his brother’s truck. I remember the cars I wanted when I was a teen and they were always someone else’s. I never wanted whatever was new and hot, mainly because I never knew what was new and hot. So I could almost feel Ryder’s excitement when he saw Hunter’s truck all souped up just for him driving up. When I was teen, my father hung on to his old Mustang and I was allowed to drive that. It wasn’t mine, but I could use it until I left for college. My brother has the car and when I sit in it today, I still get that thrill. Hand me downs are fun.

Embed from Getty Images

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Guy Fieri (@guyfieri)

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by RyderF (@ryderf05)

Photo Credit: Instagram and Getty Images

Last fall, Katie Nicholl’s latest book, The New Royals, was released to widespread ambivalence. There was so much happening around that time, with QEII’s passing and every royal biographer trying to get their books out before Prince Harry’s Spare blew them out of the water. I didn’t even read Nicholl’s book, but I covered various excerpts. In the book, Nicholl claimed that Prince William and Kate are already preparing Charlotte and Louis to be “half-in/half-out” of the institution. Meaning, in this brave new slimmed-down monarchy, only Prince George matters. Charlotte and Louis will get to do whatever they want, regardless of QEII’s declaration that there IS no “half-out” of the monarchy… when it came to Prince Harry and Meghan. Anyway, Mail columnist Richard Eden is expanding on that:

How can the Royal Family avoid history repeating itself when it comes to Prince George, the heir, and Princess Charlotte, the ‘spare’? This is the question that Daily Mail, Diary Editor, Richard Eden is asking this week, as he analyses sibling relations within the royal family.

Writing in his Palace Confidential newsletter, Richard explained: ‘From what I hear, the Prince and Princess of Wales want Charlotte, aged seven, to grow up with the expectation that she will get a job and not be a full-time royal.’

This path for the young Princess would be in keeping with her grandfather, King Charles III’s, vision for a slimmed-down monarchy. Her father Prince William, 40, who will one day be King himself, also shares this ideal for the future.

Richard described how he can understand these views, but said that he doesn’t necessarily agree with the idea of a slimmed-down monarchy.

He explained: ‘Personally, I would prefer to see a larger Royal Family, carrying out more official engagements and meeting more members of the public. If Charlotte is to get a job and not be an active member of “The Firm”, she needs to be ready to step into the breach, if needed.’

[From The Daily Mail]

I mean… at a fundamental level, the Windsors are gonna have to decide what a “working royal” is and whether royals can be “half-in.” What Harry and Meghan asked for was not unreasonable, especially given what they saw with the York princesses and some of the older royals and royal-adjacents. These questions should have been worked out years ago by QEII and Charles. Instead, the institution thought they could just half-ass everything and make sh-t up on the fly, and everyone would capitulate. Anyway, I hope Charlotte and Louis get far away from the institution as soon as they can. I hope they do end up getting jobs, not as punishment for not being born the heir, but because it feels good to take care of yourself.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Instar, Backgrid, Cover Images.

The Princess of Wales stepped out today in Slough. She visited a nursing home on Pancake Day, and I’m curious to see if we’ll get any photos of Kate digging into some pancakes (of course not). I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again – Kate’s staff forced her into pretending to care about Early Years crap, because Kate’s interest is more towards senior issues. I mean, she’s extremely lazy so she was never going to follow through on anything, but if she had her way, I bet she would have preferred to have more senior-issues in her portfolio. She’s much better with seniors than she is with kids – older people enjoy Kate and she enjoys them.

As you can see, Kate wore a very “inspired by Meghan” outfit for this visit. Black trousers, a black turtleneck, a cute purse and her Max&Co coat in camel. We’ve seen the coat several times before, especially after Meghan wore her camel overcoat just as the Sussexit was being announced in January 2020.

Today is “Shrove Tuesday” aka Fat Tuesday aka Mardi Gras, the Tuesday before Ash Wednesday and the start of Lent. Traditionally, people try to get all of their gluttony and “sinning” in before Lent. Thus, Pancake Day. Let’s pour some maple syrup over this bitch and get buck wild.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid.

Just three weeks ago, the right-wing British publication The Spectator had a piece about how the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were dreadfully unpopular in California, they were never invited anywhere, Oprah “snubbed” them and their American dream has come crashing down because of British push-polling revealing their historic unpopularity with Waitrose shoppers. You get the idea – talking points were issued and the British right-wing media jumped at the chance to create a story to sneer at the Sussexes. It also revealed that after all this time, no one in Britain understands American culture, American celebrity or how Americans view the Sussexes, in general. Speaking of, the Spectator is now convinced that Duchess Meghan is super-upset by… South Park. Last week, South Park devoted an episode to the Sussexes, just as they devoted an episode to William and Kate years ago.

Harry and Meghan have yet to publicly speak about last week’s episode of South Park, presumably because they don’t have the staff left to formulate a press release. But California sources claim that Meghan has spent the last few days “upset and overwhelmed” about how she was portrayed.

If you’ve read anything about Harry and Meghan over the last three years, you’d think the pair would be delighted with how South Park parodied them. The entire episode, titled “The Worldwide Privacy Tour,” gives them enough fodder to moan for a few more books… or Netflix documentaries… or Spotify podcasts. Meghan can cry about how she is a victim of misogyny and Harry can claim that this was all a narrative concocted by the big, bad press.

In fairness, South Park didn’t hold back. Meghan is described as a “sorority girl, actress, influencer, victim,” by a brand manager during the episode. Later on, Harry has an awakening, realizing that their obsession with branding has made them “turn ourselves into products.” He claims that there will be, “no more magazines and Netflix shows, we can just live a normal life.” However, when he leaves, Meghan decides to stay — so the prince exits alone.

Ironically, after the episode aired, rumors began circulating that Harry and Meghan were so frustrated with the show that they are now “taking it out on each other.” At least their spousal disagreements are taking place in a nine-bedroom-sixteen-bathroom mansion. No awkward passings in the hallway for them.

Sources claim that Meghan, “is annoyed by South Park but refuses to watch it all.” But for Meghan, this couldn’t have come at a worse time. The duchess is said to be “obsessed with her half-sister’s litigation.” Meghan’s half-sister Samantha Markle is suing her for defamation following their tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey. The duchess had previously filed a motion to stop depositions in the case from taking place, but it was dismissed by Florida judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell earlier this month.

Then there’s a coronation. Meghan and Harry are supposedly “weighing up” whether they will attend or not, but according to sources close to her the duchess “feels excluded,” from the whole thing. Probably better to leave it then.

Aside from all of this, the pair have been made aware that nosey journalists, ahem, have been “poking around Archewell and asking serious questions about what they actually contribute.” This comes after the couple released a report tooting their own horn.

[From The Spectator]

It’s like… the Spectator hires people to write histrionic fan-fic about what the Sussexes are doing and how miserable they are, and none of it has any connection to what’s really going on in Harry and Meghan’s lives, but the Spectator just publishes it anyway. It’s really embarrassing… for the British media. Even more so because other British outlets have now picked up this fan-fic and they’re using it to bash Meghan for it. A closed loop, an echo chamber of deranged storylines, all revealing their unhinged obsession with the Sussexes.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Archewell.

One year ago, Russian forces invaded Ukraine. Ukrainians refused to surrender, supplicate or capitulate. They fought back, they dug in, they went to war and sought allies. The EU is on Ukraine’s side. NATO is on Ukraine’s side. President Biden is on Ukraine’s side. On Monday, Presidents Day, Joe Biden turned up in Kyiv and did a series of photo-ops with President Zelenskyy, including a walk outside as air-raid sirens blared.

So, I actually believed that Dark Brandon and the Secret Service had found a way to land Air Force One in or around Kyiv, but it turns out that Dark Brandon actually took a nine-and-a-half-hour train ride into Ukraine’s capital. That’s so… Joe Biden. The man LOVES his trains. Apparently, this is the first time a sitting president has visited a war zone not controlled by American troops. Biden and his team planned this for months, even though his security was telling him not to go. But he saw other world leaders making the journey and that man said “it’s happening, kiddo.” Apparently, Vladimir Putin and his people were super-salty about it. Biden humiliated them by managing to get into Kyiv to do this.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by The White House (@whitehouse)

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Instagram.

If you ask me, it’s going to be a while until the Princess of Wales lives down her terrible appearance at Sunday night’s BAFTAs. She’s worn stupid clothes before, and she’s shown that she has a consistently bad eye for styling, but her BAFTA ensemble was a whole new level of style f–kery. Maybe that was the point, though? She wanted attention. So she threw a roll of toilet paper across her shoulder, donned her opera gloves and the cheapest-looking Zara earrings she could find and she got herself some attention. While I definitely think that’s part of it, I also just think… Kate is terrible at styling herself, and she hires stylists who don’t know what they’re doing. It’s a matter of taste, and in Kate’s case, it’s a matter of class. She’s too middle-class to understand that she shouldn’t be dripping in diamonds and pearls at funerals and Remembrance Day wreath-layings. She’s too tasteless to understand that the BAFTAs is the event for which she should bring out her bling. Plus, she knows that everyone will fall all over themselves to praise her, no matter what she’s wearing. Speaking of:

The Princess of Wales, 41, attended the BAFTA Awards alongside Prince William on Sunday wearing perhaps her most daring red carpet look to date — including a dramatic pair of full-length opera gloves. Princess Kate refashioned a white Grecian-inspired Alexander McQueen dress (her wedding gown designer!), which she wore to the same event in 2019, by swapping the corsage detail on the shoulder to a flowing sweep of white chiffon, making the look instantly feel more fashion-forward. But it was her bold choice of accessories for the star-studded event — in particular, the contrasting full-length black velvet opera gloves — which stole the show.

“Opera gloves are transformative; they have enormous leverage,” Genevieve James, creative director at royal glove supplier Cornelia James, tells PEOPLE. “They turn any event into an occasion and a dress into a statement.”

James, whose independent family business has been supplying gloves to the royal family for over 70 years, is unable to confirm that Kate is wearing her design (their identical “Melissa” black velvet style retails for $216). But Kate does have several styles from the brand, which she most recently wore in Boston in December.

Exuding old-school Hollywood glamour, the elegant accessory gave a nostalgic nod to red carpet events of the past when the likes of Grace Kelly, Marilyn Monroe and Rita Hayworth rarely attended an event without their immaculately fitted gloves, often in silk or sometimes bejeweled.

“Imagine Audrey Hepburn in Breakfast at Tiffany’s without the gloves — it’s just another little black dress. With the gloves, it becomes iconic and emblematic of our age — always relevant, always contemporary,” says James, who supplied the late Queen Elizabeth II with her signature white gloves for decades.

Kate also went bold (and budget-friendly!) in her choice of earrings for the event, which was attended by celebrities such as Cate Blanchett, Viola Davis and Julianne Moore and held for the first time at the Royal Festival Hall in London’s Southbank Centre. The rose gold effect, oversized floral earrings from Zara cost just $28. Featuring rhinestone appliqué, the statement earrings are — of course — sold out.

[From People]

The cheapness of the Zara earrings is perhaps Kate’s f–k you to the event, correct? Kate looks for excuses to raid the Royal Collection or the Diana archives, but on the rare occasion when she’s supposed to circulate with A-list celebrities wearing their finest frocks and jewels, suddenly Kate TPs herself and wears cheap Zara earrings. It’s just so bizarre. As for this glove-maker crowing about the importance of gloves… lol, no. I mean, the thing about Audrey Hepburn wearing gloves is that her gloves always looked chic and appropriately styled for the outfit. Kate just threw on a pair of opera gloves with no connection to her dress.

As for the butt-touching thing… she really did graze William’s ass, and the British tabloids have been calling all of their “body language experts” to spread the good word that Kate is sassy and she has so much chemistry with William. It’s weird how none of the body-language experts suggest that Kate is perhaps giving the audience a subtle confirmation to William’s oft-rumored sexual needs.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Vogue (@voguemagazine)

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by dumb (@lilnasx)

I am completely a cat person and believe they truly should be the ones who occupy dogs’ exalted place in our society. And when I find out someone else is also a cat person, it makes me like them more. So as if I didn’t like Lil Nas X enough, he’s now a cat dad since he adopted two kittens: Desani and Zephard. Both look to be tabbies, one orange and one gray, and both are completely adorable.

Lil Nas X is expanding his family.

The “That’s What I Want” singer, 23, announced he adopted two cats on social media by sharing photos of their adorable photo shoot and tweeting, “i’m not their step father, im the father who stepped up!”

In the photos, the two-time Grammy winner posed in a brown striped single-breasted blazer with matching trousers from Moschino’s pre-fall 2023 collection and accessorized the look with a large brown striped turban. The two cats were also dressed in matching brown outfits with large white lace collars.

The rapper holds up the cats in various images, showing them to the camera, and even shared a shot of one of the cats placing a paw on his nose and scratching him — with his reaction afterward. He teased the photo on Instagram, writing, “swipe to watch one of my cats scratch tf out of my nose.”

The cats — named Desani and Zephard — have opposite colorings, with one having dark gray fur with tufts of orange, white and light gray and the other orange and white fur.

Lil Nas X also uploaded a cute closeup of the two felines napping in a car side-by-side on his Instagram Story, though he didn’t give any information on how he came across the felines and adopted them.

[From People]

I love that he did a cute little photo shoot with his children. Though I do wonder how long those little lace collars lasted before those two little cats tore them to shreds. Anyway, I’m glad Lil Nas X got cats! They’re great companions and I always feel terrible that they seem to be a lot harder to home and are adopted at a much lower rate than dogs. It’s also great that he got two so they can keep each other company when he’s traveling. Although, some cats do have the disposition for travel. My cat is pretty easygoing about new places and since the pandemic/remote work she prefers to travel with me rather than staying behind. Maybe these little guys will be the same. And it is definitely a lot easier to travel with pets when you have celeb resources. Lil Nas X expressed some lukewarm views on cats in the past, but it appears he’s changed and I think he’ll be a great pet parent.

i’m not their step father, im@the father who stepped up! pic.twitter.com/eEnidj8NBW

— i am reading all that (@LilNasX) February 16, 2023

until you become a mother like me you’ll never understand

— i am reading all that (@LilNasX) February 16, 2023

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by dumb (@lilnasx)

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by dumb (@lilnasx)

Keanu Reeves and Chad Stahelski have an interesting interview in Wired to promote John Wick 4, which opens in March. I love Keanu and Chad’s story because Chad was Keanu’s stunt double for The Matrix and then went on to direct Keanu in the John Wick series. I learned about them when Chad, who was also Brandon Lee’s stunt double, said he did the John Wick gun blasts in post-production for safety’s sake. And while they lean heavily on special effects for gunfire, Keanu and Chad are not that wild about AI taking over. Keanu is fine working with it, but not letting AI dictate how a scene or script will look. He also doesn’t want to be surprised by what is done with his image in post-production, so much so that he had a clause put into his contract that says they can’t manipulate his image without his consent.

He has final say over his image: I don’t mind if someone takes a blink out during an edit. But early on, in the early 2000s, or it might have been the ’90s, I had a performance changed. [He won’t say which.] They added a tear to my face, and I was just like, “Huh?!” It was like, I don’t even have to be here.

Why deepfake scares him: What’s frustrating about that is you lose your agency. When you give a performance in a film, you know you’re going to be edited, but you’re participating in that. If you go into deepfake land, it has none of your points of view. That’s scary. It’s going to be interesting to see how humans deal with these technologies. They’re having such cultural, sociological impacts, and the species is being studied. There’s so much “data” on behaviors now. Technologies are finding places in our education, in our medicine, in our entertainment, in our politics, and how we war and how we work.

AI can be used in conjunction with art: Which is cool, because that’s what artists do, right? We take our influences and we synthesize them. But what’s the intention behind that synthesis?

On being the internet’s boyfriend: It’s nice when it’s nice, but I’m sure it’s super horrible when it’s horrible.

People made mods to have sex with his character in Cyberpunk 2077: Getting it on with Johnny Silverhand?! I hope it was good. I’m sure Johnny tried hard.

He doesn’t have a favorite Keanu meme: I don’t seek them out. Once in a while people show ’em to me when they’re fun.

[From Wired]

It’s interesting to hear subjects from different perspectives. My husband who teaches with much of this technology is fascinated by deepfakes and AI. But nobody is threatening to put his face in a performance he didn’t turn in. Actors make choices with their performances along with following a director’s orders. I understand why an unscripted tear would upset Keanu. It breaks the unspoken contract. To add an element like that would be like someone painting a dog into a portrait without the artist knowing until the unveiling. It’s a fascinating feature if you’re involved. But having a little cyber-Keanu being manipulated by someone else would be scary as all get out. Just look what they’re doing with poor Johnny Silverhand.

I like Keanu’s point about the intent behind the synthesis. This is where I fall on AI as well. It’s a tool and can be a valuable one. But why it’s being used and who is using it are important details to using it. Keanu and Chad talk a lot more about AI through the interview and how it could take over. The interviewer seems a little more worried than Keanu or Chad, but they recognize it’s getting good enough that their work will get manipulated. I think it’s smart for people like Keanu to be embrace that the technology is here but to remain skeptical enough to keep an eye on it.

Photo credit: Yuri Murakami/Fotoarena/Avalon and Cover Images

Rest in peace, Richard Belzer. Det. Munch has passed away at the age of 78. [Dlisted]
Review of Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania. [Pajiba]
The latest dumbf–kery from Elon Musk. [Buzzfeed]
Rebel Wilson is engaged! [Seriously OMG]
Will fans of the book enjoy Amazon’s Daisy Jones and the Six? [LaineyGossip]
I really love that Drag Race is an international franchise. [OMG Blog]
Tadashi Shoji’s collection looks so… mall style. [Go Fug Yourself]
How did I completely miss this awful look on Maya Rudolph? [RCFA]
Mariska Hargitay’s statement on the death of her friend Richard Belzer. [Just Jared]
Don Lemon is a huge sexist, right? [Jezebel]
Demi Lovato did a single for the new Scream movie. [Egotastic]
A preview of Netflix’s Next in Fashion. [Starcasm]
President Jimmy Carter is receiving hospice care. [Towleroad]

Richard Belzer was one of the most kindest and welcoming actors when I guested on two episodes of Law and Order: SVU. His passing is truly a loss for Hollywood and I will miss him dearly. RIP Richard Belzer. pic.twitter.com/oI4PzLr04I

— Marlee Matlin (@MarleeMatlin) February 19, 2023