Cardi B and Offset are currently in LA, not Atlanta. I wonder about their travels – I feel like they’ve spent so much time in New York, LA and Atlanta over the past year, and they’ve failed to social distance everywhere they’ve landed. They went shopping at Bottega Veneta in Beverly Hills over the weekend, perhaps to pick up some fine leather goods. There was some mask drama – Cardi wore her mask as she entered the shop and for a time in the shop, but she pulled it down at one point, perhaps because she wanted the paparazzi to know it was her. Cardi, don’t do that!

But the real story here is Cardi’s insane optical illusion dress. The dress is by Pierre-Louis Auvray. If you look at the construction, it makes no sense – the sweater “shrug” is built into the dress and your eye is supposed to be fooled into wondering if the dress is transparent. It’s not? But it is eye catching. She paired the dress with YSL heels. People were so surprised to see her that regular people were stopping to take photos of her.

Cardi also tweeted about missing the inauguration because she had a dentist’s appointment, which is funny. People are like “haha you should have performed WAP at the inaugural” but honestly, Cardi interviewed President Biden during the campaign and she did a lot of GOTV work, I’m a little bit surprised that the Biden people didn’t reach out to her to at least speak at that virtual inaugural ball. She also tweeted some stuff about how glad she is that Trump is gone, etc.

Ugh I was supposed to perform wap at the inauguration today but I had a dentist appointment ??….maybe next time .

— iamcardib (@iamcardib) January 21, 2021

How they trying to impeach Biden already ? He hasn’t even taken a shit at the White House yet .This just shows me how delusional and dumb people can be.????

— iamcardib (@iamcardib) January 22, 2021

I pray we don’t go back to that .I can only imagine how other people felt around America and the world .It was just the worst.

— iamcardib (@iamcardib) January 24, 2021

Photos courtesy of Backgrid.

Last week we talked about the very happy news that Netflix has confirmed season two of my newest obsession, Bridgerton. We also found out that Season twp will chronicle the love life of the eldest Bridgerton brother, Anthony. Which made me less enthusiastic since Anthony was my least favorite character. Despite being reassured by readers of the books that Anthony is quite charming and not a bore, my biggest question about Season two is if we would be seeing more of Rege-Jean, I mean the Duke of Hastings/

Duke lovers far and wide I have good tidings for thee. Showrunner Chris Van Dusen was interviewed on Today with Hoda & Jenna and he confirmed that the Duke and Daphne will be making appearances in Season two. Chris said his hope is that the Duke and consequently Daphne will always be a part of Bridgerton going forward. And I couldn’t be happier. Below are a few excerpts from Chris’s interview on Today via Deadline:

“I hope so,” Van Dusen said when asked whether Page and Dynevor’s characters will be back next season. “They are now of course the Duke and Duchess of Hastings but in my mind they will always be Bridgertons and I think they will always be part of the show.”

“I genuinely have no idea what they’re going to do with the second season, but I imagine if they’re following the books, then it would be Anthony’s journey,” she said. “I’m sure Daphne will end up getting involved. But yeah, I do wonder what it looks like. I’m excited to find out.”

Van Dusen confirmed that production on Season 2 starts in late spring in London for what is believed to be a six-month shoot.

“We have a bunch of new characters we are going to be introducing,” he said. “Anthony is going to have a love interest next season, and I think it’s going to be as sweeping and moving and as beautiful as viewers of the first season have come to expect from the show.”

[From Deadline]

Like I said before, I would watch Season 2 if I can get more of Rege-Jean and if they cast a dark skinned Black woman or South Asian woman for Kate. Rege-Jean and Adjoa Andoh (Lady Danbury) are what made Season one for me. I also loved Nicola Coughlin’s Penelope. Daphne has grown on me over time. I honestly wouldn’t have watched the show if Shondaland and Rege (specifically) weren’t attached to the project. As far as Anthony’s love interest, Kate, is concerned, I have joined a reader in her campaign to get Simona Brown cast as Kate. Simona is stunning and I am here for it. I also believe that Kate will need to have just as much charisma as Rege’s Duke to carry the season. Jonathan Bailey as Anthony will need to turn up the heat in his character’s personality. Chris Van Dusen has done an amazing job in fleshing out the main characters and making them extremely likeable and sexy. He has done a great job capturing romance and creating intimacy with touch and conversation.

Chris also confirmed that they will begin filming Season two of Bridgerton in late Spring in London, so hopefully we will get Season two by Christmas 2021. So, as I patiently wait for Chris and Netflix to announce the cast, I am ordering the second book as I hear it is one of the best books out of the Julia Quinn Bridgerton series. Maybe book two will convert me into liking Anthony. Also, I have been forgoing watching Bridgerton for the 100th times and I have instead fallen down the hilariously dark dark world of Bridgerton TikTok. There are so many brilliant folks making fanfiction content on that app. I have also gotten my Rege-Jean fix like a fiend by devouring every interview I can find on Youtube. It is annoying that not only is Rege hot, he is also intelligent, witty and seemingly empathetic. Anyway, enough of my Rege obsession.

You can watch the full interview here

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by chrisvandusen (@chrisvandusen)

photos credit: Netflix

When Dr. Anthony Fauci did his first briefing during the Biden administration last week, he stepped up to the White House press briefing room podium and looked like a new man. His skin was glowing and he looked 20 years younger. He seemed happy and relieved that he could just do his job and talk about pure science, pure public health, pure immunology and virology. I think many of us feel that way now that Joe Biden is president too – lighter, not terrified, not having to play these stupid f–king games with morons. Dr. Fauci spoke to the NY Times about his time working with the Trump White House, which was basically the past year of his life, a year which saw him harassed by Donald Trump, threatened by MAGA morons and dealing with a mountain of misinformation coming straight from the White House. The full interview is worth a read. Some highlights:

When things started going wrong with Trump: “It coincided very much with the rapid escalation of cases in the northeastern part of the country, particularly the New York metropolitan area. I would try to express the gravity of the situation, and the response of the president was always leaning toward, “Well, it’s not that bad, right?” And I would say, “Yes, it is that bad.” It was almost a reflex response, trying to coax you to minimize it. Not saying, “I want you to minimize it,” but, “Oh, really, was it that bad?”

When Trump talked about how the virus would disappear like magic: “That’s when it became clear to me: I’m not going to proactively go out and volunteer my contradiction of what the president said. But he would say something that clearly was not correct, and then a reporter would say, “Well, let’s hear from Dr. Fauci.” I would have to get up and say, “No, I’m sorry, I do not think that is the case.” It isn’t like I took any pleasure in contradicting the president of the United States. I have a great deal of respect for the office. But I made a decision that I just had to. Otherwise I would be compromising my own integrity, and be giving a false message to the world. If I didn’t speak up, it would be almost tacit approval that what he was saying was OK.

Things got “nefarious” but no one explicitly told him to stop disagreeing with Trump: “After a TV interview or a story in a major newspaper, someone senior, like Mark Meadows, would call me up expressing concern that I was going out of my way to contradict the president. There were a couple of times where I would make a statement that was a pessimistic viewpoint about what direction we were going, and the president would call me up and say, “Hey, why aren’t you more positive? You’ve got to take a positive attitude. Why are you so negativistic? Be more positive.”

When the death threats started: “Many, many months ago. In the spring. Hold on — just bear with me. [He consults someone who answers “March 28.”] So there — you got it from the head of my Secret Service detail. That’s when I got protection, so maybe two weeks prior to that. It was the harassment of my wife, and particularly my children, that upset me more than anything else. They knew where my kids work, where they live. The threats would come directly to my children’s phones, directly to my children’s homes. How the hell did whoever these assholes were get that information? And there was chatter on the internet, people talking to each other, threatening, saying, “Hey, we got to get rid of this guy. What are we going to do about him? He’s hurting the president’s chances.” You know, that kind of right-wing craziness.

Someone mailed him powder: “One day I got a letter in the mail, I opened it up and a puff of powder came all over my face and my chest. That was very, very disturbing to me and my wife because it was in my office. So I just looked at it all over me and said, “What do I do?” The security detail was there, and they’re very experienced in that. They said, “Don’t move, stay in the room.” And they got the hazmat people. So they came, they sprayed me down and all that. [The powder] was a benign nothing. But it was frightening. My wife and my children were more disturbed than I was. I looked at it somewhat fatalistically. It had to be one of three things: A hoax. Or anthrax, which meant I’d have to go on Cipro for a month. Or if it was ricin, I was dead, so bye-bye.

Why he didn’t resign: “When people just see you standing up there, they sometimes think you’re being complicit in the distortions emanating from the stage. But I felt that if I stepped down, that would leave a void. Someone’s got to not be afraid to speak out the truth. They would try to play down real problems and have a little happy talk about how things are OK. And I would always say, “Wait a minute, hold it folks, this is serious business.” So there was a joke — a friendly joke, you know — that I was the skunk at the picnic.

Whether he believes Donald Trump cost the country tens or hundreds of thousands of lives: “I can’t comment on that. People always ask that and … making the direct connection that way, it becomes very damning. I just want to stay away from that. Sorry.”

[From The NY Times]

There’s more in there about how things worked internally at the White House when Fauci disagreed with Trump publicly or in private meetings, and Fauci also laments the fact that very early on – and throughout the pandemic – Trump began listening to complete randos about the virus. Trump simply was unable to think critically about information, and he gave equal weight to what Fauci said and what his golf buddy said, and the golf buddy usually won out. Anyway, I do think Trump murdered hundreds of thousands of people with his willful ignorance and lies.

No, Twitter remains undefeated. ?? pic.twitter.com/411xZcFDRz

— maybe: diane (@dianelyssa) January 22, 2021

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

A post shared by Shonda Rhimes (@shondarhimes)

Shonda Rhimes has a new essay on her website, Shondaland, about the importance of gratitude and how it helped her make sense of this last year. Since I am a cynical bitch who gets angry encountering people without masks at the store (which seems to be every time I go out), I needed to read this. Shonda isn’t all sunshine, affirmations and rainbows either, which I appreciate. She writes that it took her a long time to come up with things to be grateful for, but once she thought of one nice thing it started flowing. She understands the skepticism about it and this practice of gratitude has really helped her feel better and more positive overall. Here are some excerpts, but if you’re interested I recommend reading this at the source. Shonda is such a good writer that it’s well worth it. Plus it convinced me that I should find more things to be grateful for.

Gratitude can sometimes be hard to find. Many times in the past year, I’ve had a very hard time locating gratitude. It’s not simple to get yourself to reach the space inside to be grateful. But that space? That gratitude space?

If you open yourself to it, that space can feel like a hit of clean sweet oxygen from a mountain top. It can renew you. If you can find gratitude in your angriest moments, your saddest moments, your most hurt moments, you can rise out of the pain and into something better. The muck of life can be washed clean. If you can say yes to gratitude, you can step out of your darkest places and find a little light.

You are maybe rolling your eyes. Raising a not-so-nice finger. I hear you. But I don’t say this trying to give you some kind of mushy, self-help, heal-y, woo-woo guru talk. I say this as a practical matter…

I say this because now I know gratitude and gratitude knows me and it has fundamentally rearranged the way my brain works.

My point is, I understand that these days, reaching that gratitude space for you might feel harder than it’s ever felt before.

At my lowest moments, I have found a way to locate gratitude. The first time I did it, I was sure I was doing something futile and crazy. Woo-woo and stupid. A waste of my time.

It’s turned out to be one of the best things I’ve ever done…

Thinking of good things, finding things that I am grateful for is essential. Yes, I know it takes time. But you know what takes about the same amount of time? Complaining. So does whining and negativity. So does self-shaming. So does listing all the things that are wrong and not going your way, griping about all the reasons you can’t accomplish something, detailing all the excuses you have for not striving to be someone better than you were yesterday.

No one wants to be the person who drags herself and all the people around her down. The goal is to always be a person who is rising and lifting other people up along with us.

[From Shondaland]

I love what she wrote about how it takes just as much time to be negative as it does to be positive. I don’t ever want to discount people mourning or being understandably frustrated and depressed at where we are now. Being sad and upset is perfectly reasonable, and Shonda acknowledges that while focusing on how gratitude has helped her.

About a month ago, around the holidays, I got myself a new notebook from Dollar Tree and did something similar to this. I wrote “Good Things about 2020? on one page and “What I’m looking forward to in 2021? on the next page. I put stickers on it to motivate myself more. It’s been sitting on my desk, but I haven’t looked at it since, so this is a good reminder. At the very top of my list is “learned to bake,” because I don’t remember baking anything before last year and now I love making bread. After that were things like “got to spend more time with my son” and “made new friends.” Plus I took so many cool classes over Zoom that I wouldn’t have been exposed to otherwise. This year, hopefully by the fall, I look forward to meeting some of my new friends. I’m also so looking forward to getting vaccinated! Whenever I start to think about how mad I am that terrible people can ruin things, I will try to think of this list. I even came up with some new things today!

I saw this tweet below because this is a nurse who was tweeting about the importance of wearing masks. She had this pinned to her profile and I thought it was perfect.

there is a battle between two wolves inside us all. One is Evil;is anger, jealousy, greed, resentment, inferiority, lies and ego. The other is Good; joy, peace, love, hope, humility, kindness and truth.”“Grandfather, which wolf wins?” The Grandfather replied: “The one you feed.”

— RN MotherF’er CEN,CCRN (@Meidas_Kelly) December 30, 2020

A post shared by Shonda Rhimes (@shondarhimes)

A post shared by Shonda Rhimes (@shondarhimes)

Photos via Instagram and the picture on the frontpage is a screen shot from this video

Back in November, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge announced that their beloved dog Lupo had passed away. Lupo was given to William and Kate in 2012, when he was just a puppy, by Kate’s brother James Middleton. James is a huge dog lover, and he seems to have a side business breeding cocker spaniels. Lupo was the son of James’ dog Ella, and James kept Lupo’s sister Luna. Well, last year, James bred Luna and she had a litter of puppies, and now it looks like William and Kate – and the kids – had already picked out a puppy from Luna’s litter. They already welcomed the new puppy into their home before Lupo passed away.

They were devastated by the death of their dog Lupo two months ago, but the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and their three children are now ‘besotted’ by a new cocker spaniel. The eight-month-old black puppy was a gift from the Duchess’s brother James Middleton and arrived at Anmer Hall, the family’s home in Norfolk, before Lupo died.

‘The new puppy is adorable and the whole family are besotted,’ a friend told The Mail on Sunday. ‘They were devastated when Lupo passed away, as any dog owner will understand, but got the new puppy before he died. It was hoped that a younger dog would give Lupo some company and give him a little more life and energy.’

The family will no doubt be hoping the new arrival has the same sweet nature as Lupo, who was its uncle. Mr Middleton, 33, originally bred a litter of puppies from his dog Ella in 2011. He kept one called Luna but gave brother Lupo to Kate in early 2012 when Prince William, then an RAF search-and-rescue pilot, was deployed to the Falklands.

Last summer, Mr Middleton, who was staying with his parents at their Berkshire home, bred another litter of six puppies with Luna as their mother. It is understood Kate and William had the pick of the litter, helped by Prince George, seven, and Charlotte, five. Two-year-old Louis was probably too young to help.

Royal aides have not yet confirmed the name the family have given to their new pet. When the litter was born, James and his fiancee Alizee Thevenet, 31, posted pictures on Instagram of themselves with the six puppies, his other spaniels Ella, Inca, Luna and Zulu plus golden retriever Mabel.

[From The Daily Mail]

“It was hoped that a younger dog would give Lupo some company and give him a little more life and energy.” I’ve only had overlapping dogs once in my life and that was not my experience at all. If anything, the older dog spends his last days angry at his family for bringing the young whippersnapper into the fold. Now, it sort of works with cats? You can overlap an old cat with a kitten and most likely, the older cat will enjoy the younger kitty. But I’m just not sure it works with dogs. Poor Lupo! Gah. Anyway, congrats to the Cambridge fam. While this article doesn’t mention it, Emily Andrews (who wrote this piece) said on Twitter that the new puppy is a girl. Also: I do love the commitment to getting black dogs. Black dogs and black cats are the least likely to be adopted in shelters.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by James Middleton (@jmidy)

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Avalon Red, social media.

Embed from Getty Images

We spent last spring and summer watching local authorities, National Guard and federal authorities clash with Black Lives Matter protesters across the country. The overwhelming majority of the BLM protesters were non-violent, but that didn’t stop cops from violently clashing with protesters repeatedly. There were also mass-arrests around the country, and we consistently saw police forces grossly overreact to protests. So it was startling, just months later, to see Capitol Police and DC Police completely abdicate their responsibility during the Capitol siege on January 6th. There were only a handful arrests on the day, and literally thousands of seditious a–holes got to throw a murderous coup and then they flew home the next day. There were no mass arrests on the day, something I still don’t understand. Of course the insurrection was an inside job, but even the “good cops,” the ones who weren’t part of the insurrection, they didn’t even bother arresting any of the people who violently sieged the Capitol.

In the weeks following the siege, the FBI has been crowd-sourcing information and identifying terrorists. As of this writing, less than 150 of the Capitol insurrectionists have been arrested. And now the FBI wonders if they should continue charging these terrorist f–kers. I cannot f–king believe it.

Federal law enforcement officials are privately debating whether they should decline to charge some of the individuals who stormed the U.S. Capitol this month — a politically loaded proposition but one alert to the practical concern that hundreds of such cases could swamp the local courthouse. The internal discussions are in their early stages, and no decisions have been reached about whether to forgo charging some of those who illegally entered the Capitol on Jan. 6, according to multiple people familiar with the discussions.

Justice Department officials have promised a relentless effort to identify and arrest those who stormed the Capitol that day, but internally there is robust back-and-forth about whether charging them all is the best course of action. That debate comes at a time when officials are keenly sensitive that the credibility of the Justice Department and the FBI are at stake in such decisions, given the apparent security and intelligence failures that preceded the riot, these people said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss legal deliberations.

Federal officials estimate that roughly 800 people surged into the building, though they caution that such numbers are imprecise, and the real figure could be 100 people or more in either direction. Among those roughly 800 people, FBI agents and prosecutors have so far seen a broad mix of behavior — from people dressed for military battle, moving in formation, to wanton vandalism, to simply going with the crowd into the building.

Due to the wide variety of behavior, some federal officials have argued internally that those people who are known only to have committed unlawful entry — and were not engaged in violent, threatening or destructive behavior — should not be charged, according to people familiar with the discussions. Other agents and prosecutors have pushed back against that suggestion, arguing that it is important to send a forceful message that the kind of political violence and mayhem on display Jan. 6 needs to be punished to the full extent of the law, so as to discourage similar conduct in the future.

[From WaPo]

The fact that there is even a law enforcement debate about this is proof that white supremacists have infiltrated the highest rungs of federal agencies. Imagine if one thousand armed BLM protesters had laid siege to the Capitol, murdered a cop, erected gallows, smeared feces on the walls, hunted for elected officials and stolen property. The FBI would have arrested every single person ON THE DAY, and they would all be prosecuted using the maximum charges and there wouldn’t be any hand-wringing whatsoever about it. Nor should there be, honestly. A line was crossed and the fact that there are apparently a great number of FBI and DOJ officials who are wishy-washy about CHARGING TERRORISTS is terrifying to me.

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

Photos courtesy of Getty.

In December, Her Serene Highness Princess Charlene stepped out for a Christmas-themed event, and she publicly debuted a new haircut. The haircut is… very dated. It’s basically a ‘90s skaterboy haircut, half-shaved and half-long. Many people said at the time that it was a Cry For Help Haircut, and soon enough, we learned why Charlene was struggling. It turns out that Prince Albert is due in Italian court on a paternity claim. I’ve lost count of how many paternity suits Albert has had over the years but it’s A LOT. I kind of believe that he’s got additional kids out there who we don’t even know about because he quietly paid off the mothers. Anyway! Going back to Charlene’s hair, most of us thought the cut was a tragedy, but Charlene has given an interview and she says it wasn’t any kind of visual S-O-S.

Monaco’s Princess Charlene doesn’t care what you think about her buzzcut. The royal is opening up about her dramatic new “half-hawk” haircut in a new interview on Wednesday with French magazine, Point de Vue, saying that was her “decision.” And that once the shock wore off, her husband Prince Albert has grown to like it!

Charlene, who turns 43 on Monday, debuted her new look on December 16 at the Palace’s annual Christmas party. Asked whether as a public figure she has found a way of dealing with the criticism that followed, she launched into a quick defense.

“This haircut was my decision,” she responded. “It seems that it has provoked all kinds of comments. But it turns out that I wanted it for a long time, the style pleases me. That’s all.”

Describing herself as an uncommon princess, she continued, “Certainly, of all the members of royal families, I’m probably the one who has tried the most different hairstyles, and I’ll continue. That’s my choice.”

The royal, who in the past has addressed criticisms branding her as distant and “unsmiling,” says she was prepared for strong reactions to her dramatic style change. “Of course. The remarks of ‘But what is she doing?’ and ‘But it’s not royal!’ — I know these all too well. And I have nothing to say to them, except that we’re in 2021 and that in these times which are so troubling, so difficult, there are other, much more important subjects which deserve our attention. What counts is that Jacques and Gabriella adore seeing their mother with her new style. And that after the initial surprise wore off, the prince understood and likes it now too.”

[From People]

I can’t stop imagining if Duchess Kate or Duchess Meghan did something this dramatic with their hair. We wouldn’t be able to stop talking about it for weeks, and there would be literally hundreds of thinkpieces about hair, women, feminism and “royal protocol.” And Charlene’s like “screw you guys, I did it for myself, end of.” Good for her if it’s something she’s always wanted and she honestly DGAF. But I also sort of believe that it’s still a cry for help, or at the very least, a very public screw-you to her husband and to Monaco in general.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

Since I’m not part of the Snake Fam, I sometimes forget that Taylor Swift has actually been in a very serious relationship for the past four years. Reportedly, Taylor met Joe Alwyn in the fall of 2016, just as she was ending things with Tom Hiddleston (RIP Tiddles). Joe and Taylor were pretty quiet about their relationship for months, but slowly she let the Snake Fam see bits and pieces of her thing with Joe. Throughout the past four years though… this relationship has just been different from anything she’s ever been through. She seems genuinely content with Joe and there hasn’t been the strong “performative love” aspect, which has been common with other boyfriends. Sure, I think Tay and Joe look like brother and sister, but even I have to admit that they seem like a mature match and a good match. So, no surprise, we’re hearing now that Tay and Joe are in it for the long haul.

Taylor Swift and Joe Alwyn are “in it for the long haul.” The singer and the actor have been dating for about four years and appear to be stronger than ever. Just last week, they were photographed holding hands on a rare outing in London, where they are quarantining together.

A source tells ET, “Taylor has gotten more and more comfortable being public with Joe and letting fans in on their romance in a way that she feels is still protecting it. She loves Joe so much and, of course, is not trying to hide their relationship, but she prefers to keep specific details private. Taylor and Joe are in it for the long haul and totally see a future with each other. They don’t need outside praise or attention and are so fulfilled just being with each other and growing together as a couple.”

Alwyn and Swift’s time spent together in quarantine, meanwhile, has been great for the pair. They even collaborated on her album, Folklore, with the actor — under the pseudonym William Bowery — co-writing a number of her songs, among them “Betty” and “Exile.”

Last month, another source told ET that the singer’s beau has been a “great support system” as she’s dealt with not only the global threat of the coronavirus, but also her mother’s health battle.

“He is the one constant in her life that she can truly rely on,” ET’s source said. “Joe has helped Taylor with her music, inspiring it. She is so grateful for him and in love with him. He is her cheerleader and rock. They have spoken about their future together and they love celebrating the holidays together.”

[From Entertainment Tonight]

I do wonder if either of them wants to get married. I mean… four years, they live together, they collaborate with each other, they’re “in it for the long haul.” Of course no one has to get married and of course marriage isn’t for everyone. I’m just curious about whether they’ve discussed it and decided that they don’t need it. Taylor’s fans are always eager to claim that Taylor will announce, any day now, that she and Joe got hitched, or that she’s wearing a wedding dress in some album artwork therefore they got married in quarantine or something. I always think back to that Graham Norton interview with Taylor and John Cleese, where he spoke about getting a divorce and Taylor joked about that being the reason she wasn’t married. I think she’s very aware of her wealth and how her business would be affected. Hm.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Taylor’s social media.

Casey Affleck was trending the other day when the cardboard cutout of Ana de Armas was photographed being thrown out by… someone…outside Ben Affleck’s house. I think it was pretty obvious at the time that it wasn’t Casey? But, you know, Twitter sometimes takes off with something and it gets wild. Ca…

Lady Gaga’s team helped Garth Brooks with his glam and I’m obsessed with this. Was he wearing her line, Haus Laboratories? If you don’t think Garth Brooks knows his way around a liquid liner than you clearly don’t remember Chris Gaines. “I mean, it’s one banana, Michael. What could it cost? $10?” If…